Ask a potential client what's driving them to look for a solution right now, how the problem is affecting their business, what happens if nothing changes, and how the decision gets made. Skip the scope questions. Here's what I teach: your job on a first call is to listen and ask, and the real information arrives in the follow-up question.
Open by asking what prompted them to look, then ask what the problem is costing before you discuss scope.
Value questions surface the real problem and the urgency behind it, which is what a proposal has to answer.
Write your five value questions on one page and keep it open during your next call.
Resist the urge to solve the problem.
Leah Neaderthal, Smart Gets Paid
Open a first call by inviting the potential client to talk first, with one question that hands them the floor. The opening question does more work than any other question on the call, because it sets who is doing the talking for the next twenty minutes.
My openers, depending on how the conversation started:
Each one is a hot potato. It gives them something they have to do something with, and it puts them in the position of describing their own situation rather than receiving your description of yours.
There's a real mechanism underneath it. Tamir and Mitchell at Harvard found that disclosing information about yourself activates the brain's reward system, the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area, and that people gave up real money for the chance to do it, forgoing around 17% of their potential earnings in one experiment. Getting a potential client talking about their own situation isn't a stalling tactic. It's the part of the call they will enjoy most.
Value questions ask why the work is important to the client, rather than what the work contains. Scope questions tell you what to quote. Value questions tell you what a yes is worth to them, and that's the information a proposal has to answer.
The questions I ask in step one of my system:
While they answer, listen for the magic words: the phrasing that tells you which problem they walked in the door with. I call the presenting problem the thing they name first, and it's what your work has to point at. It's also the same listening that tells you whether this is someone you want to work with, which matters as much as whether they want to work with you.
You get past the surface-level answer by staying with the question you already asked. The first answer to any question is the easiest one available, and the information worth having sits one layer under it.
"Tell me more about that." "Say more." Both are short, neither sounds like an interrogation, and both signal that you're still listening.
The average person in a sales conversation waits two or three seconds before jumping in. A provocative question can take eight to ten seconds to answer, so the gap you're rushing to fill is the person thinking. Lean back. Let it sit.
Filling silence feels like being helpful, and jumping in with a solution feels like proving you can do the work. Both instincts cost you the same thing: the answer you asked for. This is where the peer mindset earns its keep, because you're evaluating them as much as they're evaluating you, and you're not grateful to be in the room.
Ask how the decision gets made inside the client's organization while you're still on the first call. This is the most overlooked and most valuable part of the conversation, because your next move depends on the answer.
Three questions get you there:
The answers decide your next move. If they're ready, you write a proposal. If a stakeholder you have never met has to approve it, that changes how the sale gets run and it's worth knowing now rather than in six weeks. Then take the next step onto your own plate, because your clients are busy and won't do anything that feels like work. When the next step is another conversation, book it before you both hang up.
Most women I work with prepare for a first call by getting ready to talk. They rehearse how to describe the work, what to say about their background, how to handle the moment it turns to price. Then the call happens, they perform, and afterward they can't tell whether it went well. The ones who tell me they're great on calls are usually the ones who stopped performing.
Flip it. Your job on that call is to listen and ask. Listening mode on. Stick with the question. Listen for the magic words. And resist the urge to solve the problem, which is the hardest one, because solving it is how you've always shown you're good.
Here's the part that surprised me when I learned it: diagnosing provides more value than solving does. When you take what you heard and reflect it back with your expertise layered on, "let me see if I have this right," people feel understood. They conclude that if a first conversation feels like this, the work must be worth having. You've given them clarity. You haven't given away the solution.
That's the whole move, and it's learnable. It has nothing to do with being a salesperson.
Twenty to thirty minutes is enough to run the whole thing. My three steps, discovering value, providing clarity, and gaining alignment, fit inside twenty minutes once you stop trying to cover it all. A shorter call also protects the frame: you're having a conversation between peers, and a peer conversation doesn't need an hour.
Invite them to a call anyway. Sending pricing on request turns the start of a relationship into a transaction, and you never get to talk about value first. I teach resisting the automatic yes here: they asked for a number, and your next step is still a conversation. Say the call is what lets you make the best recommendation, then make scheduling easy.
No, sending your questions in advance invites prepared answers, and prepared answers are surface answers. The information you want comes from following an unrehearsed reply with "tell me more about that." Send a short note confirming the time and what you'd like to cover at a high level, then ask your real questions live.
Weigh in without doing the work. Framing your input as "you're going to want to think about" keeps you advising instead of delivering, and pointing out the questions their draft raises shows expertise while leaving the work intact. Answering their questions with better questions is still valuable, and it isn't the same as handing over a finished plan.