Guide 04

The complete guide to following up without chasing

Most consulting work is lost in the silence between conversations, not to a no. Here is what to send, how often, and why the version that feels polite is the one that kills the opportunity.

In short

Following up gives a busy person something. Chasing asks them for a status update, which is a request for work. Once you sort your messages by which one they are, the discomfort mostly goes away and so does the silence.

Leah Neaderthal

Founder, Smart Gets Paid

smartgetspaid.com

Published August 18, 2026

What you need to know

Silence almost never means no. It means your project isn't the most urgent thing in someone's week.
A message that asks "any update?" transfers work to the client. A message that hands them something does not.
Most consultants stop after two attempts, which is roughly where a B2B process begins.
You need a rhythm rather than a rule, and it should stretch over months rather than weeks.
A proposal is a document your contact uses to sell you internally, so write it for the people who were never on the call.
Wanting the work more than the client does is visible in every message, and it changes how you're read.
Letting an opportunity go gracefully keeps it available. Disappearing does not.
A dead opportunity can be restarted with three sentences, and the awkwardness stopping you is entirely on your side of it.

What's in this guide

What silence means

Silence is a scheduling fact, not a verdict

When a potential client goes quiet after a good conversation, the overwhelming likelihood is that nothing happened. No decision was made against you. Their week filled up.

This is hard to believe from where you sit, because the conversation mattered enormously to you and you've replayed it. It occupied twenty minutes of a day in which they also handled a budget problem, a staffing issue and forty other emails.

Here is what's usually going on behind the quiet:

The person who has to approve it has been traveling.
A different project blew up and ate the quarter.
They are waiting on a number from finance and have nothing to report.
They meant to reply, and then it moved down the screen.

None of those is about you, and none of them resolves itself. That is the important half. An unattended opportunity doesn't mature on its own in the background. It goes stale, and the person who could revive it's you.

So the question is never whether to follow up. It is what to put in the message, which is the rest of this guide.

The distinction

The difference is whether the message gives or asks

A message that asks for a status update is a request for labor. A message that hands over something useful is a gift. That single distinction sorts almost every follow-up problem you have.

Look at the two side by side:

Asks (chasing)	Gives (following up)
"Just checking in on this"	"This came out this morning and made me think of your situation"
"Any update on the proposal?"	"One thing I should have mentioned about the phasing"
"Wanted to bump this to the top of your inbox"	"Here's how another organization handled the same approval problem"
"Are you still interested?"	"No reply needed. Flagging this in case it's useful"

Read the left column as the recipient. Every one of those requires her to produce something she doesn't have, which is why she doesn't answer, which is why you feel ignored, which is why the next message is even harder to write.

The right column costs her nothing. She can read it, feel looked after, and reply or not.

And notice what changes for you. Writing "just checking in" for the fourth time feels humiliating because you're asking for something and being refused. Sending something useful does not, because you're not asking.

The two-line test before you hit send

Read the message and ask: if she reads this and does nothing at all, was it still worth her opening? If yes, send it. If the only value is in the reply you hope to get, rewrite it.

You can't want it more than your client does.
Leah Neaderthal, Smart Gets Paid

The hard case

What to send when you have nothing new to say

You will usually have nothing new to say, and that's the actual problem to solve, because it's the reason most people default to "just checking in."

The answer is that the material doesn't have to come from the deal. It comes from your work, your reading and your judgment, all of which are running anyway.

Things worth sending, in rough order of usefulness:

Something that happened in their industry. A regulatory change, a competitor's move, a piece of research. One sentence on why it matters to them.
A thought you had about their specific problem. You have been thinking about it. Say the thought.
How someone else solved it. No names needed. The shape of the solution is the value.
Something you made. An article, a talk, a framework. Sending your own work isn't self-promotion when it's on their problem.
A genuine human note. They mentioned a product launch, a move, a conference. Ask how it went.
A clean status without a request. "Holding a slot in November in case this comes back around. No action needed."

That last one is worth dwelling on, because it does something the others do not. It tells them the door is open, gives them information about your availability, and explicitly relieves them of the obligation to reply.

If you keep a simple note on each live opportunity, this gets much easier. What they care about, what's happening in their world, what you've already sent. Ten minutes of upkeep turns the blank page into a list.

Do it straight after the conversation while it is fresh, not at the end of the week. What you want is the detail you would otherwise lose: the phrase they used for the problem, the name of the colleague who has a competing view, the month their budget resets.

The posture

You cannot want it more than they do

Wanting the work more than the client does is visible in every message you send, and it changes how you're read.

It shows up in small things. The apology at the top. The three paragraphs of context. The hedge at the end that offers a way out before they asked for one. The reply within ninety seconds at ten at night.

None of that's a character flaw. It comes from the feast-or-famine cycle: when this is the only live opportunity, it carries the whole month, and that weight is legible.

Two things fix the posture, and only one of them is about writing.

The writing half: send shorter messages, don't apologize for existing, and stop offering exits. "Let me know if now isn't the right time" sounds gracious and functions as permission to end it.

The structural half matters more. What gives you your power back isn't needing this particular opportunity that much, and the only way to get there's to have several live at once. A consultant with six real conversations writes differently from a consultant with one, and no amount of careful wording substitutes for the difference.

Four tells that the weight is showing:

An apology in the first line.
Three paragraphs of context they already have.
An exit offered before they asked for one.
A reply sent within ninety seconds, at ten at night.

So if your follow-up feels desperate, the fix might not be in the message. It might be that you've one opportunity and need five.

Cadence

A rhythm you can hold for a year

Follow-up should stretch across months and shift in tempo. Most consultants manage two attempts.

The usual pattern is three messages in ten days followed by permanent silence, which combines the two worst options: it feels pushy in the moment and it abandons the opportunity right before the timeline B2B runs on.

A rhythm that works looks roughly like this:

When	Tempo	What it looks like
First month	Weekly	Recap, the thing you promised, one useful item
Months two and three	Every two or three weeks	Industry note, a thought on their problem
Months four to six	Monthly	Something you made, a clean no-action status
After six months	Quarterly, indefinitely	A genuine note when something reminds you

Two things make this sustainable. Put the next touch in your calendar the moment you send one, so you never have to remember. And accept that quarterly forever is a perfectly respectable end state, because the client who resurfaces after eight months is an ordinary event in this business.

The other reason to stretch it out: the trigger that creates the need hasn't happened yet. You aren't persuading them. You are staying in the frame until their situation changes.

Proposals

A proposal is a document somebody else uses to sell you

Write the proposal for the people who were never on the call, because your contact is going to forward it to them, and it'll be read without you in the room to explain anything.

That reframe fixes most proposal problems at once. It explains why a document full of your methodology fails, and why the version that works reads more like a summary of their situation than a description of your services.

What a forwardable proposal has to do:

Restate their problem in their words, accurately enough that a colleague who wasn't on the call recognizes it.
Name the outcome, not the activity. What is different in their business afterwards.
Make the scope legible, so nobody has to guess what's included.
Carry the number cleanly, stated once, without justification wrapped around it.
Say what happens next, with a date.

Length is almost always the enemy, and presenting it live does more than emailing it into a void when the decision is close. A short document gets read by five people; a thirty-page deck gets skimmed by one. The lightweight version, a proposal that fits in an email, exists precisely because it survives forwarding.

And the proposal is rarely why you lost. By the time it goes out, the work has mostly been done or not done in the conversations before it. A good document confirms a decision that's already forming. It doesn't rescue one that never started.

Reducing the ask

Make the yes as small as possible

Every barrier between them and a yes is a place the opportunity can stall, so the work is to make agreeing require as little as possible.

Some of this is administrative and it matters more than it should. Send the contract when you say you will. Do not make them chase you for a number. Answer the question they asked rather than the one you prepared for.

Some of it's structural. A large first commitment is a large decision, and a large decision needs more people, more time and more risk tolerance. A smaller, well-defined first piece of work is often the difference between a project starting this quarter and stalling until next year, and it gives you a working relationship inside the organization, which is worth more than the fee.

The smaller first step is a real offer. It is scoped, priced properly and useful on its own, which is what makes it easy to say yes to.

What it must never be is free consulting dressed up as a next step. Giving away the diagnosis doesn't lower the barrier; it removes the reason to hire you.

The restart

How to restart an opportunity that has gone completely dead

An opportunity that went silent months ago can be reopened, and the message that does it's shorter than the one you're drafting in your head.

Most consultants never try, because the silence has calcified into embarrassment. Six months on, writing feels like admitting you were strung along, so the whole thing gets written off.

From the client's side almost nothing happened. The project got deprioritized, the person got busy, and your name hasn't crossed their mind since. There is no grudge to overcome and no awkwardness to manage, other than yours.

What makes a restart work is a reason that's not about you:

Something changed in their world. A funding round, a new hire, a regulation, a competitor's move.
Something changed in yours. New capacity, new work in their sector, something you built that's relevant.
A genuine trigger date. The start of a fiscal year, the quarter they mentioned.

The message itself is three sentences. Name the trigger. Say what made you think of them. Offer one specific, small next step.

What to leave out

No apology for the gap, no recap of the previous conversation, and no reference to the fact that they never replied. Every one of those makes it about the silence, which is the only thing that could make it awkward.

Then treat the reply, or the absence of one, as information. A restart that gets nothing back means you move them to the quarterly rhythm, and a dead opportunity is rarely permanently dead in a business where budgets reset every year.

What to do when you are the one who went quiet

Sometimes the silence is yours. A project consumed you, three weeks became three months, and now the follow-up feels harder because you're the one who dropped it.

Send the message anyway, and don't explain. A short note that picks up where things were, with something useful attached, works exactly as well as it would have in week two. The client hasn't been tracking your silence with the attention you have.

The only version that needs a sentence of acknowledgment is one where you promised something specific and never sent it. In that case, send the thing, note that it took longer than you said, and move on in the same message.

The graceful exit

How to let one go without closing the door

When an opportunity has truly gone quiet, say so plainly and leave the door open, rather than disappearing.

Most consultants handle this by simply stopping, which feels like dignity and functions as a broken thread. Six months later, when the situation changes, the awkwardness of re-entry is high enough that nobody bothers.

The alternative takes one message. Name that the timing seems not to be right, say you're going to stop sending things for now, and tell them you'll check in once in a while. No guilt, no last attempt, no exit interview.

Two useful side effects. It often produces the honest answer you've been missing, because it costs them nothing to reply to a message that asks for nothing. And it makes the next contact easy, because the thread ended cleanly instead of trailing off.

Here is your next move, this week. Open your pipeline and put every live opportunity into one of three columns: has a scheduled next step, has no next step, or has gone quiet past six months. For the middle column, send one giving message each and calendar the following touch. For the third, send the graceful exit. You will end the week with fewer open loops and at least one honest answer.

Leah's take

Follow-up is the part of the sales process that most obviously rewards the person who's willing to be slightly more organized than everybody else.

That is all it is. The consultants who get the work aren't braver or more charming. They kept a list, they sent something useful every few weeks, and they were still there when the reorganization happened in March.

The reason it feels harder than that is the story attached to it. Every unanswered message gets read as a small rejection, and after four of them the whole activity feels like begging. So I would offer you the reframe that changed it for me: a follow-up is a service. You are helping a busy person keep a thread alive that she also wants alive, and which she doesn't have the bandwidth to maintain on her own.

Once you believe that, the messages get shorter and better, and the whole thing stops costing you anything emotionally.

And the awkwardness you're worried about is almost entirely yours. She isn't sitting there judging your third email. She barely remembers the second one.

There is one more reason I push on this so hard. Follow-up is the most democratic part of the sales process. It doesn't require charisma, a large network, or a natural ease with selling. It requires a list, a calendar reminder, and something useful to say every few weeks, which is available to absolutely everyone reading this. The consultants who are winning work you're not are frequently not better than you. They are just still in the thread.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related guides

Guide 02

The consulting sales system: leading a B2B sales process from first conversation to signed contract

A consulting sale takes months, several people and someone to lead it. Here is the process underneath it, and where most consultants lose the work.

Guide 05

Value-based pricing for consultants: how to get paid for value instead of time

The hourly rate you set in your first month is now your ceiling. Here is where a price really comes from, and how to say one out loud calmly.

Go deeper

Get more of the clients you want, and get paid more for your work

Leah writes to women running B2B consulting businesses every week, about getting clients on purpose and getting paid for the value of the work.

Sign up for the newsletter Apply to The Academy