Keep going. The people who can hire you are mostly lurkers: they read everything and touch nothing, and engagement was never the measure of whether your posts are working. Here's what I tell the women I work with: your ideal clients are reading in silence. What matters is who's reading, and what happens off the feed.
Keep posting on a weekly rhythm and judge it by conversations started, never by likes.
Around 90% of any online audience reads without ever engaging, and the readers include the people who can hire you.
Check your profile views this week and note who's been looking without ever commenting.
You didn't do anything wrong. It's just whether your post got picked up into the larger content stream that day.
Leah Neaderthal, Smart Gets Paid
The likes and comments aren't coming because the people you want to reach read without ever engaging. This is so consistent across the internet that it has a name: the 90-9-1 rule, from Jakob Nielsen's research on participation inequality.
In any online community, roughly 90% of members are lurkers who read or observe without contributing, 9% contribute a little from time to time, and 1% do most of the engaging. Nielsen found the pattern holds across platforms, from forums to blogs to social networks.
| Group | Share | What they do |
|---|---|---|
| Lurkers | ~90% | Read and observe, never touch a post |
| Occasional contributors | ~9% | Comment or share once in a while |
| Heavy contributors | ~1% | Produce most of the likes and comments |
Now look at who your ideal clients are: senior, busy people inside companies and nonprofits, reading on a train or at 11pm. They're the lurkers. So the silence under your posts mostly means your audience is behaving normally. Most of them never planned to say anything.
Yes. Every post reaches a slice of your network, and the size of that slice swings for reasons that have nothing to do with quality:
I've posted content I thought would kill, and it didn't. One of my favorite posts ever got 717 views. That's the feed being the feed. Mix it up, keep going, and know that tomorrow's another day.
This is also why the network you build matters as much as the posts you write. When your connections are curated, when they're the people you want to work with instead of a decade of random accepts, then even a post that reaches a fraction of them is landing in front of exactly the right people. Small reach into the right room does more for your consulting business than big reach into the wrong one.
You know your posts are working by what happens off the feed, usually on a delay of weeks or months. Watch for these instead of likes:
And the honest other half: if months of weekly posting bring none of that, no profile views, no conversations, nothing, then something upstream needs adjusting, usually what you're posting or who your network is made of. And if people engage but clients never come, that's a different problem: posting that isn't turning into clients has its own diagnosis.
Give a weekly posting rhythm a full quarter before you judge it, because everything about a B2B consulting sale runs on a long clock. A company signing a real engagement takes months of conversations, so the posts and the clients arrive on different schedules.
A quarter of weekly posting buys you three things:
Quitting at week six has a specific cost: the people who were just starting to notice you stop seeing you, and when their problem finally lands on their desk, you're not the one they think of. If the deeper worry is that work is slowing down right now and posting feels too slow, what to do first when work slows down comes before any posting strategy.
Real talk: have you ever read an Amazon review? Okay. Have you ever written one? That's the whole dynamic, and you're living it from the other side. You read, you evaluate, you decide, and you never say a word. Your potential clients use LinkedIn exactly the way you use Amazon. Most of the women I work with are lurkers themselves.
And I know what the silence does in your head. You're a woman who has been excellent at everything, and when you do the work and hear nothing back, you assume you got it wrong. That's not a character flaw. That's how high performers are wired, and it's head trash all the same. The silence is not a grade.
So keep going, judge it by the right signals, and let the lurkers do what lurkers do: read you for six months and then, one day, send the message that starts a real conversation.
The Academy is where I teach the whole system, with a room of women doing the same work.
No. A post keeps working long after the feed moves on. Every silent visitor who clicks your name scrolls your recent posts, and those quiet posts are what turn a curious lurker into a warm first call. Deleting them thins out exactly what your best readers came to see. Leave them up and keep building.
Likes from other consultants are pleasant, and they're not the measure. Other consultants are your peers, and peers engage because they get it, while your potential clients read in silence. Peer comments do carry one real benefit: they widen the post's reach into their networks, where your next client might be reading. Enjoy them, just don't steer by them.
Yes. Commenting puts your name and your thinking in rooms where your ideal clients already spend attention, and it costs you a few minutes. A sharp, generous comment on the right post gets read by people who will never see your feed. It's also the lowest-risk way to stay visible in a week when you have nothing to say.
A profile view with no connection request usually means a lurker is warming up. Reading your posts, checking your profile, coming back a week later: that's how busy people evaluate you. Don't pounce on them with a pitch. Keep posting, and if you have a genuine reason to say hello, a friendly, no-pitch connection note is enough. Let them finish deciding at their own speed.